ThailandTIP Forum

Bitte loggen sie sich ein oder registrieren sie sich.

Einloggen mit Benutzername, Passwort und Sitzungslänge
Erweiterte Suche  

Neuigkeiten:

Hier kommen sie zu den aktuellen Nachrichten auf ThailandTIP.info
Seiten: 1 ... 43 [44] 45 ... 102   Nach unten

Autor Thema: Die Regierung Yinglak Chinnawat ยิ่งลักษณ์ ชินวัตร (Nachlese)  (Gelesen 195787 mal)

0 Mitglieder und 1 Gast betrachten dieses Thema.

namtok

  • Globaler Moderator
  • Thailand Guru
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Beiträge: 30.000

Wahrsagerischer Hokuspokus um die Pechsträhne der Familie auszubügeln:



Yingluck at Chiang Mai temple to dispel bad luck





http://www.bangkokpost.com/news/politics/707652/yingluck-at-chiang-mai-temple-to-dispel-bad-luck
Gespeichert
██████  Ich sch... auf eure Klimaziele !

namtok

  • Globaler Moderator
  • Thailand Guru
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Beiträge: 30.000

Soeben eine Strafanzeige gegen die Staatsanwaltschaft eingereicht:


Yingluck Shinawatra 3 hrs ·

On the 29 September 2015, Miss Yingluck Shinawatra filed a criminal case at the Criminal Court against the Attorney General and relevant persons for a concerted effort in causing damages towards other individuals in accordance to criminal code section 83; for the negligence of duty in accordance to the criminal code section 157 and for the failure to perform their duties in accordance to criminal code section 200. The 3 wrongdoings include


1. The Attorney General decided to indict her without sufficient examination of materials, evidence and witnesses that were deemed relevant and valuable to the case. Which is required under the Organic law on criminal procedure for person holding political positions. Some of these issues include the inconclusive issues from the rice pledging scheme, negligence of duty and issues related to acts of corruption. The Attorney General failed to take these issues into account and indicted her 1 hour before the impeachment process at National Legislative Assembly.

2. The Attorney General filed a case which included additional accusations that were not included in the case filed by the National Anti Corruption Commission (NACC). The NACC case under the criminal code section 157 did not include accusations regarding corruption or allowing for acts of corruption to occur under the rice pledging scheme but the Attorney General included these accusations which should be considered as illegal.

3. During the court procedure, the Attorney General also used materials that were not included in the both NACC's and joint task force between NACC and Attorney General's investigation process. The Attorney General included additional 60,000 pages of materials into the case, which should also be deemed illegal.


Therefore, Miss Yingluck believes that it is necessary for her to protect herself by exercising her rights in accordance to the law to file a case against all actions by the Attorney General and relevant persons that are not in line with the law, regulations and the rule of law.


Gespeichert
██████  Ich sch... auf eure Klimaziele !

namtok

  • Globaler Moderator
  • Thailand Guru
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Beiträge: 30.000

Ganz schön was los vor dem Gericht...

Gespeichert
██████  Ich sch... auf eure Klimaziele !

crazyandy

  • Gast

Wird auch langsam aber sicher Zeit, nur wer spricht dann dafür Recht, sind das unabhängige Richter, es währe zu hoffen .
Gespeichert

Kern

  • Globaler Moderator
  • Thailand Guru
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Beiträge: 16.315

... sind das unabhängige Richter  ...
:D    :]

Diese Frage gehört leider eher in den "WITZE- und COMIC-Thread".
Gespeichert

Alex

  • Thailand Guru
  • *******
  • Offline Offline
  • Beiträge: 13.393
Gespeichert
Wir sind nicht auf der Welt , um so zu sein, wie andere uns haben wollen !

crazyandy

  • Gast

na wie toll wenn man sich schon im vorhinein einen Persilschein geben kann, wie undemokratisch und korrupt Yingluck ist sieht man daran das Sie diesen sich nicht selbst geben hat.
Gespeichert

Khun Tan

  • Gast

Ein offener Brief an die Junta via Facebook (Sorry, leider in Englisch):

Yingluck Shinawatra

Open Letter

To: General Prayuth Chan-ocha,

Head of the National Council for Peace and Order

I am writing an open letter to you because I haven't had the opportunity to communicate with or meet you in person since you came into power as the Head of the National Council for Peace and Order (NCPO) and the Prime Minister over a year ago on 22 May 2014. Since then, I have been continuously mistreated related to the “Rice Subsidy Scheme”, which I had declared to the parliament on many occasions;

1. National Legislative Assembly (NLA) impeached and removed me from the position of Prime Minister although at the time I was not in that position because I had already resigned and also was disqualified of the position by the Constitutional Court.

2. The Attorney General held a press conference stating his decision to indict and prosecute me to the Supreme Court’s Criminal Division for Persons Holding Political Positions just a mere “one hour” before NLA’s impeachment.

You may reject an issue and state that these are not relevant to your responsibility since these two matters are in the hands of the NLA and the Attorney General. However, the following matter will be in your direct authority.

Regarding the Order no.448/2558 signed by you and the Minister of Finance dated April 3rd, 2015 under the subject of “the Appointment of the Fact Finding Committee”, you have appointed a committee to find out whether anybody must be responsible to pay compensation to the government for the damages incurred from the Rice Subsidy Scheme. In this matter, you spoke to the press insisting that if someone was found responsible for damages, compensations must be claimed.

You also emphasized that “if the fact finding indicates that if someone is guilty, then the conclusion is guilty. If the fact finding suggests otherwise, then the conclusion would be not guilty. If guilty, the due process shall be followed in filing for civil claim. Single standard is applied for all parties to ensure justice in an equitable manner.”

I sincerely hope you assigned the Fact Finding Committee to investigate the case under due process of law to provide “Justice” and adhere strictly to the due process without any unnecessary acceleration to conclude the findings. I hope that you will ensure fair and just opportunity for related persons to present evidences.

I feel worried because one of your legal advisors had publicly stated that it was conducive to claiming damages in the civil case which would cost enormous court fees to the government although the way normally used to claim for damages and to bring the case to the court is the best way to maintain justice.

However, your legal advisor tried to “misinterpret the law and legal mechanism” to claim for damages by advising you to issue administrative order, forcing me to pay for damages and to seize my asset just to avoid the court fees. By exercising the Administrative Order, you do not even have to consult the cabinet. It means that you are using your power as if you were a judge while the criminal case trial is still under the legal process in court.

I am making this statement as the former Prime Minister who was in charge of the Rice Subsidy Scheme that was aimed at enhancing the living conditions of the Thai farmers, who are responsible for the production of our nation’s commodity. The scheme was also vital in addressing issues in the rice price and market mechanism. I performed my duties with the utmost dedication to ensure that it led to the economic and social advancement of the nation. The scheme was managed under the position of Chairman of National Rice Policy’s Committee during my term as it is with you in the same position today.

I believe all people are entitled to a fair trial in court which is fundamental to the rule of law. The Rice Subsidy Scheme was a public policy that was declared to the parliament and the implementation of the scheme was compulsory administrative act. The Scheme legally binds all related government departments to its execution. Therefore, the claim process of civil charge must be transparent and fair. You, as the Prime Minister and as the Chairman of National Rice Policy Committee, are currently addressing rice issues in disagreement of my rice policy. This means that you are a "stakeholder" and cannot possibly offer "unbiased" views on the matter. Therefore, exercising the Prime Minister power as a judge to order a civil claim without the court’s decision is definitely against the rule of law.

To proceed in accordance to the rule of laws, I propose to you as follow:

1. Reconsider and terminate any executions regarding the Rice Subsidy Scheme’s civil claim proposed by your legal advisors and signed by the Prime Minister and the Chairman of the National Rice Policy Committee at the present which are unfair and is subject to conflicts of interest.

2. After the court’s ruling in the criminal case, the government should file a civil claim through the court in order to be just to the accused if found guilty.

3. The trial at the Supreme Court’s Criminal Division for Persons Holding Political Positions is still not final. Your legal advisor stated that the case’s statute of limitation still have enough ongoing time. The government should not accelerate or shortcut the fact finding procedure for the case. To be fair and just, you should provide sufficient opportunities for related persons to testify and present their evidences. I have sent many requests to you and the Fact Finding Committee asking for the opportunity to present evidences but many requests have not been considered and examined.

Finally, I have asked my lawyer to submit the formal letter in this matter to you on Tuesday October 13th, 2015 at 10.00 a.m. at the government’s Information and Complaint Channel. I sincerely hope that when you receive this letter, you would not simply ignore it but consider my request in a just manner since you have always claimed that you will ensure equal justice for all.

Thank you.

Yingluck Shinawatra
Former Prime Minister of Thailand
12th October 2015

https://www.facebook.com/Y.Shinawatra/photos/a.106877456023385.4057.105044319540032/1093227190721735

Gespeichert

namtok

  • Globaler Moderator
  • Thailand Guru
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Beiträge: 30.000
Gespeichert
██████  Ich sch... auf eure Klimaziele !

namtok

  • Globaler Moderator
  • Thailand Guru
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Beiträge: 30.000

Die Armee hatte dauernd ein Auge darauf und verhinderte mehrere Programmpunkte, auch um die Möglichkeit einer "Absetzbewegung" nach Laos aufs andere Flussufer zu verhindern. Sie beschwerte sich darüber dass sie sogar beim Gang aufs stille Örtchen von Soldaten abgelichtet wurde

http://www.bangkokpost.com/news/politics/739436/yingluck-upset-by-military-scrutiny-during-ne-trip


Die Beliebtheit bei der Landbevölkerung scheint ungebrochen, Video:





Gespeichert
██████  Ich sch... auf eure Klimaziele !

namtok

  • Globaler Moderator
  • Thailand Guru
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Beiträge: 30.000

Heute mal wieder ein Gerichtstermin - Video von der Ankunft :


Gespeichert
██████  Ich sch... auf eure Klimaziele !

namtok

  • Globaler Moderator
  • Thailand Guru
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Beiträge: 30.000

Der Prozess wegen der Reissubventionen wird sich mindestens ein Jahr hinziehen, die letzten Zeugenaussagen sind für Nov 2016 angesetzt. Darauf einigten sich heute Anklage und Verteidigung beim heutigen Termin:


Yingluck Rice Subsidy Trial to Stretch Through End of Next Year

http://www.khaosodenglish.com/detail.php?newsid=1446117567&section=11
Gespeichert
██████  Ich sch... auf eure Klimaziele !

crazyandy

  • Gast

Premierminister gewährt Ermittlern Immunität

Bangkok - Premierminister General Prayuth Chan-ocha gewährte mittels Artikel 44 der Übergangsverfassung allen Behördenmitarbeitern Immunität, die wegen des umstrittenen Reisprogramms der Vorgängerregierung ermitteln.

General Prayuth erließ ein entsprechendes Dekret, das am 31. Oktober in der Royal Gazette veröffentlicht wurde. Das Dekret garantiert Schutz vor etwaigen juristischen Schritten und Disziplinarmaßnahmen, die im Zusammenhang mit Ermittlungen im umstrittenen Reisprogramm aufkommen könnten

wochenwitz.com/nachrichten/bangkok/69264-premierminister-gewaehrt-ermittlern-immunitaet.html

fragt man sich doch wie die Herren ermitteln, das die besonders geschützt werden müssen

Der ehemalige Abgeordnete der Phuea Thai Party, Worachai Hema, hatte im Oktober angedeutet, dass die Rothemden am heutigen Tag rote Hemden tragen, um ihre Solidarität mit der ehemaligen Premierministerin zu beweisen.

Seit dieser Ankündigung ist das Militär alarmiert. NCPO-Sprecher Oberst Winthai Suvaree sagte, es gäbe keinen Grund, weshalb Yinglucks Sympathisanten ausgerechnet rote Hemden tragen sollten. Sie könnten jedwede Farbe tragen, wenn sie sich solidarisieren.

„Warum müssen sie ihre Unterstützung für sie zeigen, indem sie eine symbolische Farbe tragen?“, fragte Oberst Winthai rhetorisch.

Rothemdenanführer Jatuporn Prompan rief seine Leute auf, vorsichtig zu sein und sprach von einer „Falle der Gegenseite“. Er warnte, dass einige Leute in rot, die aber gar keine Rothemden seien, womöglich zur Unruhe anstiften könnten. Das könnte dann vom NCPO ausgenutzt werden, aus Sicherheitsgründen länger an der Macht zu bleiben als ursprünglich vorgesehen.

ist doch klar das die rote Farbe der Partei ein extrastarkes Zeichen setzt,  ;} ;} prima weiter so.
Gespeichert

namtok

  • Globaler Moderator
  • Thailand Guru
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Beiträge: 30.000
Gespeichert
██████  Ich sch... auf eure Klimaziele !

franzi

  • Thailand Guru
  • *******
  • Offline Offline
  • Beiträge: 9.256
  • Gott vergibt, franzi nie!

Zumindest den Namen koennten sie richtig schreiben.

fr
Gespeichert
Wenn ich nur "hier" schreibe, meine ich Nakhon Si Thammarat und Umgebung
Seiten: 1 ... 43 [44] 45 ... 102   Nach oben
 

Seite erstellt in 0.025 Sekunden mit 19 Abfragen.